GDPR Copilot for independent consultants
Scope controller and processor roles correctly across every client in your portfolio.
Why GDPR consultants use ISMS Copilot
- Scope each client's role correctly: controller, processor, or joint controller, with the determinants spelled out
- Build Article 30 records of processing activities that match the client's actual data flows
- Recommend Article 28 data processing agreement clauses that hold up under scrutiny
- Reuse a structured method across the portfolio instead of re-deriving scope each engagement
- Move faster through the documentation so billable time goes to advice, not typing
- Keep guidance current as enforcement and guidance evolve
Portfolio-grade GDPR tooling
Records of processing activities (ROPA) templates (Article 30)
Controller / processor / joint-controller scoping guidance
Article 28 data processing agreement clause drafting
DPIA guidance for higher-risk processing
Data subject rights procedures
Privacy policy and notice generation
Scoping controller/processor roles across a client portfolio
The single mistake that unravels a GDPR engagement is misclassifying the client's role. A SaaS vendor is usually a processor for customer data but a controller for its own employee and prospect data — often both at once, for different processing. That determination drives everything downstream: who owns the Article 30 record, which Article 28 clauses must be in the contract, and who answers a data subject request. Across a portfolio you make this call repeatedly, under time pressure, with no two clients identical. ISMS Copilot gives you a consistent method: work through the determinants per processing activity, generate the matching ROPA, and produce Article 28 clauses fit for the role you scoped — so the foundation is right before the documentation is built on it.
Explore the GDPR Copilot →Frequently Asked Questions
How does it help with the controller vs processor decision?
It works through the legal determinants per processing activity — who decides the purposes and means — rather than per client, since one organisation is frequently a controller for some data and a processor for other data. You confirm the call; the tool keeps the reasoning consistent across the portfolio.
Does it draft Article 28 clauses?
Yes. It produces data processing agreement clauses aligned to the Article 28 requirements, matched to whether your client is acting as controller or processor in the relationship.
Can I reuse work across clients?
The method is reusable even though each client's facts differ. You apply one structured scoping and documentation approach across every engagement instead of starting from scratch.
Ready to streamline your compliance work?
Built for speed, accuracy, and audit-ready output.