Free tool
AI model documentation completeness checker
Self-score how complete the documentation of one AI system or model is, as a model card, a dataset datasheet, or a technical-documentation file. The areas follow the EU AI Act's Annex IV technical-documentation structure for high-risk systems and Annex XI for general-purpose AI models, read alongside ISO/IEC 42001:2023. You get a completeness heatmap and a prioritised list of what to write next. A starting point for your documentation file, not a conformity assessment.
Structured around EU AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) Annex IV and Annex XI and ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Area descriptions are original editorial content; refer to the primary sources for official wording and normative requirements.
This is a self-assessment completeness aid for one model or system, not a certification, audit, conformity assessment, or legal advice. It does not reproduce EU AI Act normative text or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 clause and control titles. Confirm what your specific system legally requires against the primary sources below and, where the EU AI Act applies, the conformity route for your risk tier.
Overall documentation completeness: Not answered
0 of 14 areas answered
What to document first
No weak areas flagged from what you answered. Keep the documentation versioned with the model and reviewed. This is still not a conformity assessment.
Rate each documentation area on how complete and reviewed the written record is today, not on how good the underlying practice is.
What goes into AI documentation, and which rule asks for it
AI documentation is not one document. Three sources shape what a complete record holds: the EU AI Act's Annex IV (the technical documentation a high-risk system needs under Article 11), its Annex XI (what a general-purpose AI model provider documents under Article 53), and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (the management system that keeps the documentation maintained). The areas in this checker map to those, grouped by documentation domain. The mapping below is our plain-English summary of the requirement structure, not a reproduction of the text.
| Documentation domain | What a complete record holds | Primary anchor |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose and intended use | What the system is for, who uses it and in what context, its version and acceptable use, and the misuse it is not for. | EU AI Act Annex IV(1); Annex XI model description |
| Data and datasets | Where the training, validation, and test data came from, how the datasets were built and labelled, and how quality and bias were examined. | EU AI Act Annex IV(2), Article 10; Annex XI data information |
| Model design and performance | The key design choices and architecture, the metrics and evaluation results, and the known limitations and expected accuracy. | EU AI Act Annex IV(2)-(4); Annex XI architecture and evaluation |
| Risk, oversight, and transparency | The risks to people and their mitigations, the human-oversight measures, and the instructions given to the people who use the system. | EU AI Act Annex IV(5), Articles 9, 13, 14 |
| Lifecycle, security, and provenance | Robustness and cybersecurity measures, versioning and post-deployment monitoring, and the third-party components and standards relied on. | EU AI Act Annex IV(2), (6), (7), (9), Articles 15, 72; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
Primary sources
- EU AI Act, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 Annex IV (technical documentation for high-risk systems, Article 11), Annex XI (general-purpose AI model documentation, Article 53), and Articles 9, 10, 13, 14, 15, and 72. (checked 2026-06-25)
- ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Artificial intelligence management system The international AI management system standard whose data, transparency, and lifecycle expectations the same documentation supports. Full text is published by ISO and national standards bodies. (checked 2026-06-25)
Jurisdiction: EU (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) and international (ISO/IEC 42001:2023). The EU AI Act binds providers and deployers of in-scope AI systems placed on or used in the EU market; ISO/IEC 42001 is a voluntary international standard.
Important
This tool gives a structured self-assessment to orient the documentation of a single AI model or system. It is not legal advice, not an audit, and not a conformity assessment. Whether the EU AI Act applies to your system, and which obligations follow, depends on your system's risk classification and your role (provider, deployer); some requirements, including the full conformity-assessment route for high-risk systems, are not captured by this questionnaire. Confirm your obligations against the primary sources and, where needed, a competent adviser.
FAQ
How is this different from your EU AI Act risk checker?
The risk checker answers a prior question: what risk tier is your AI system under the EU AI Act (prohibited, high-risk, limited, minimal), and what role obligations follow. This checker assumes you already have documentation duties and scores how complete the documentation itself is. Use the risk checker first; use this once you are writing the technical-documentation file.
How is this different from your ISO 42001 readiness checker?
The ISO 42001 readiness checker scores your organisation-wide AI management system against the management-system clauses 4 to 10. This checker scores the documentation of one specific model or system at the artifact level (its model card, dataset datasheet, and technical file). The two are complementary: the management system is how documentation like this gets produced and kept current.
Does a high score mean my system is EU AI Act compliant?
No. This is a self-assessment of documentation completeness for one system. EU AI Act conformity for a high-risk system depends on the actual content of the documentation, the conformity-assessment route, and other obligations that a questionnaire cannot determine. Treat the result as a drafting aid, not a compliance statement.
We only build a general-purpose AI model. Is this still useful?
Yes. The areas reflect Annex XI as well as Annex IV, so the data, architecture, evaluation, compute, and acceptable-use areas line up with what a general-purpose AI model provider documents under Article 53. The same areas also match ordinary model-card and dataset-datasheet practice, so the tool is useful even where the Act does not apply to you.
Are these the official Annex IV or ISO clause headings?
No. We deliberately do not reproduce EU AI Act normative text or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 clause and control titles. Each area is our own plain-English description, anchored only by the Annex or Article number. Consult the primary sources for the official wording.
Do you store my answers?
No. Scoring runs entirely in your browser. There is no form gate; the JSON and CSV exports and the printable report are generated locally on your device.
By ISMS Copilot.
Ready to do compliance work faster?
Built for speed, accuracy, and audit-ready output.
