Cloud Act / Schrems II exposure analyzer
Map your vendor's international-transfer exposure across the dimensions counsel actually evaluates — jurisdiction, hosting, transfer mechanism, support access, AI sub-processors — as a structured starting point for a Transfer Impact Assessment.
Framed against GDPR Chapter V, the CJEU Schrems II judgment (C-311/18), the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, EU SCCs and the extraterritorial reach of the US CLOUD Act / FISA §702. This tool reports per-dimension exposure only — it deliberately does NOT output a 'compliant / non-compliant' verdict. It is not legal advice.
Supplementary measures to weigh with your DPO
Where a transfer is exposed to third-country government access, these are the categories of safeguard to assess and document as part of your accountability record, not prescriptive vendor swaps. The analyzer above estimates your exposure and whether a transfer impact assessment is indicated.
- •Re-examine the transfer mechanism: confirm SCCs are the current modules with a documented Transfer Impact Assessment, or that DPF certification actively covers the data in question.
- •Consider technical supplementary measures — strong encryption with customer-held keys (HYOK/BYOK) so the provider cannot decrypt unilaterally; data minimisation; pseudonymisation.
- •Constrain operational access — EU-based support, just-in-time and logged privileged access, documented access controls.
- •For the AI/processing layer, assess third-party model providers as sub-processors with your DPO; consider EU-based providers if minimisation or replacement is required.
- •These are categories to assess with counsel, not prescriptive vendor swaps; document the analysis as part of your accountability record.
Official sources
Jurisdiction: EU/EEA transfers to third countries under GDPR Chapter V, with US law (CLOUD Act, FISA Section 702) for the access-exposure dimensions, as in force on the dates below.
- CJEU judgment of 16 July 2020, Case C-311/18 (Schrems II), EUR-Lex (Last verified 2026-07-17)
- EDPB Recommendations 01/2020 on supplementary measures, version 2.0, adopted 18 June 2021 (Last verified 2026-07-17)
- US Department of Justice: CLOUD Act resources (Last verified 2026-07-17)
FAQ
- Does this tool tell me if I'm Schrems II compliant?
- No — deliberately. Schrems II / GDPR Chapter V compliance is a fact-specific legal assessment for your DPO or counsel. This tool maps your exposure across the dimensions counsel evaluates and gives you a structured starting point for a Transfer Impact Assessment, not a compliant/non-compliant verdict.
- Our data is hosted in the EU — are we fine?
- Not necessarily. EU hosting reduces some exposure, but a US-controlled provider can still face FISA §702 / CLOUD Act compelled-disclosure obligations, and support/engineering access or AI sub-processors can re-introduce transfers. That is why this assessment treats jurisdiction, control, hosting, access and the AI layer as separate dimensions.
- What is a Transfer Impact Assessment (TIA)?
- After Schrems II, where you rely on SCCs (or similar) for a third-country transfer you must assess whether the destination's law and practice undermine the safeguards, and adopt supplementary measures where needed. The analysis must be documented. This tool structures the inputs to that analysis.
- Does the EU-US Data Privacy Framework solve this?
- Only partly. The DPF can provide a transfer basis to US importers that are actively self-certified for the relevant data categories. It does not cover non-certified importers, non-US third countries, or every processing scenario, and remains subject to legal challenge — so the other dimensions still matter.
- Is this legal advice?
- No. It is a free, structured starting point based on your inputs. It is not legal advice and not a substitute for your DPO or counsel; Schrems II compliance depends on facts specific to your processing, including some not captured here.
- Do you store my answers?
- No. The analysis runs entirely in your browser. There is no form gate and we do not capture or store your inputs.
By ISMS Copilot. Framed against GDPR Chapter V, the CJEU Schrems II judgment (C-311/18), the EU-US Data Privacy Framework, EU SCCs and the extraterritorial reach of the US CLOUD Act / FISA §702. This tool reports per-dimension exposure only — it deliberately does NOT output a 'compliant / non-compliant' verdict. It is not legal advice.
Gotowy do usprawnienia pracy nad zgodnością?
Zbudowane z myślą o szybkości, dokładności i wynikach gotowych do audytu.
